What a bunch of perverts we have on this site.I couldn’t tell if she enjoyed patting herself on her butt, so I had to watch it again to form a conclusion.
:lmao::lmao::lmao: well played
I hope we do see her in Playboy...it might be the first one I have bought since the China (the female wreslter) days.
:huh:
...it might be the first one I have bought since the China (the female wreslter) days.
:puking smiley:
Must watch Erin Andrews vid again to get terrible image out of my head.
This was definitely staged.
[QUOTE=bleedsgreenandgold;420190]This was definitely staged.[/QUOTE]
That was kind of my impression, since she just stood in the perfect spot for basically five minutes.
She stood in front of the mirror. Ever think the person who filed it had thought this out?
:huh:
from back in the day when I actually thought wrestling was entertaining to watch. The introduction of women made it worth while…manly or not. Tits are tits. Haha.
http://bigkevo23.tripod.com/wrestlingbabes/id7.html (OVER 18 ONLY)
Oh and some interesting facts about her
Accomplishments Outside The Ring:
- Joanie posed for playboy in the fall of 2000. It was a record selling issue selling over 3.5 million copies.
- Joanie posed for the January 2002 issue of Playboy magazine and that issue was in the top 10 best selling issues (3 million copies sold.)Once again Joanie issue beat out Rena Mero’s issue by 1.5 million copies.
Case in point…I wasn’t alone. In 2000 I was a sophomore in HS, at that age you’d look at anything naked.
it may be staged, but people talking of her looking at her body in the mirror and standing in front of a mirror for an amount of time are obviously not married, or at least not to someone who is comfortable. Pretty easy to take your time when your career is your looks/body and you think you are in a PRIVATE area.
I have to agree with EE, a sex tape is one thing, this woman’s privacy was violated. For the rest of her life she will now have a phobia.
[QUOTE=brentrob55;420210] I was a sophomore in HS, at that age you’d look at anything naked.[/QUOTE]
I’m 36 and would still gladly look at anything naked. I don’t think that changes.
[QUOTE=s9er;420215]I’m 36 and would still gladly look at anything naked. I don’t think that changes.[/QUOTE]
BDD just sent you a PM.
[QUOTE=s9er;420215]I’m 36 and would still gladly look at anything naked. I don’t think that changes.[/QUOTE]
43 and agree
it may be staged, but people talking of her looking at her body in the mirror and standing in front of a mirror for an amount of time are obviously not married, or at least not to someone who is comfortable.
This. 100 times this.
The day my wife only spends 5 minutes in front of a full length mirror is the day I start getting to **** on time.
For the rest of her life she will now have a phobia.How about the darker side of this? I doubt that peephole has only seen Erin Andrews and I doubt that's the only hotel with one.
A peephole? Really? I dont know about this…
I don’t know why it has taken me this long to add this to the thread but…
I’d let her sit on my face…
I don't know why it has taken me this long to add this to the thread but....I’d let her sit on my face…
I wanted to say it, but I was trying to be discreet and only saying she’s not a true blonde.
So if this was through a door peephole, I was always under the assumption that those only worked in one direction (inside the room to outside). If that truly is the case then it adds to the belief it was staged.
[QUOTE=CharSFNiners;420237]I wanted to say it, but I was trying to be discreet and only saying she’s not a true blonde.
So if this was through a door peephole, I was always under the assumption that those only worked in one direction (inside the room to outside). If that truly is the case then it adds to the belief it was staged.[/QUOTE]
I’m 100% in agreement.
i just showed my g/f the video and she also seems to think it is staged....but her argument is because, "that is so staged [B]because no girl[/B] does her hair without her shirt/dress on because its not worth the risk of messing it up!"disagree, my ex would do her hair and makeup in a robe and then dress. Not sure the hair reasoning but the make-up she said was so it wouldn't get on her clothes. I liked her method though.
So if this was through a door peephole, I was always under the assumption that those only worked in one direction (inside the room to outside). If that truly is the case then it adds to the belief it was staged.I know they sell reverse peep hole views that someone can use to actually see into a place that has a peep hole. and no, never used one.... just know they have them.
[QUOTE=cibik02;420247]disagree, my ex would do her hair and makeup in a robe and then dress. Not sure the hair reasoning but the make-up she said was so it wouldn’t get on her clothes. I liked her method though.
My wife gets ready, hair, makeup, etc in the raw and then dresses- no red flags from that.
The reason I think it’s staged is that she stayed/moved around the sightline for a while. The little butt squats were a tipoff and the couple of crotch-shots she gave were a little telling as well.
I could be wrong, but this just doesn’t pass the smell test.
But, I give credit where credit is due- she is a piece of a$$ pure and simple and props to her for taking care of herself.
Wonder what her vitals are? 5’7" 120 lbs or so would be my guess.
I wanted to say it, but I was trying to be discreet and only saying she's not a true blonde.So if this was through a door peephole, I was always under the assumption that those only worked in one direction (inside the room to outside). If that truly is the case then it adds to the belief it was staged.
I’m surprised you guys never did this or seen this happen in college. Surprisingly (or scarily) the peep holes are very easy to remove. It’s made of 2 pieces that go on both sides of the door and just screws together. You can unscrew it by hand. So if you can distract the person in the room, you can either completely remove it and have a hole (which seems to be what happened here) or turn it around to work backwards.
That’s another reason this sort of seems staged. Somebody had to remove the peep hole. Either somebody at the hotel had to do it when she wasn’t there. Or it was staged. If it was removed by somebody at the hotel when she wasn’t there you would think she would notice when she returned to the room.
However, I don’t know that it has been completely confirmed that it was a peep hole. Just based on the position, location, height of the camera it seems reasonable that it was the peep hole. Even more scary is that somebody could have drilled a hole in a wall of the room, say through a picture so that it was hard to notice from within the room.