NNN Stats

Ramblings
1

So when NNN was down, I found this site…

[URL]http://www.quantcast.com/ninernation.net[/URL]

Shows a breakdown of NNN and its users… pretty interesting.

2

OK I must be missing something… how would that site be able to track any of those characteristics of NNN. They seem (and obviously are) completely random.

Yeah… 33% of nnn users are female… riiiiight

3

Nah thats totally bogus. No way there are more people of any race other than white than there are white people are here. And no way there are 1/3 women. More like 1/50th.

4

That was entertaining but bs

5

Hmmmm… interesting. I didnt even think about that.

6

8% are between 3 and 11… hope they don’t have access to the politics forum…

Explain this
No College 62 = 28%
College 99 = 40%
Grad School 218 = 32%

I’m hoping the person who did this math would have fit in the hoping for GED grouping?

7
Hmmmm... interesting. I didnt even think about that.

Not only are the stats ridiculous (33% female is absurd), you also have to wonder how the hell a site like that would have ever gotten all of this info. Pretty sure none of us ever filled out a NNN or quantcast survey telling our race or income.

8

[QUOTE=Chisox17;349887]Not only are the stats ridiculous (33% female is absurd), you also have to wonder how the hell a site like that would have ever gotten all of this info. Pretty sure none of us ever filled out a NNN or quantcast survey telling our race or income.[/QUOTE]

I told them you were white and worked for the Bcats- they probably just took a guess on the income based on that. :lol:

9

[QUOTE=Chisox17;349887]Not only are the stats ridiculous (33% female is absurd), you also have to wonder how the hell a site like that would have ever gotten all of this info. Pretty sure none of us ever filled out a NNN or quantcast survey telling our race or income.[/QUOTE]

Where’s Mac?

j/k :biggrin:

10
Explain this No College 62 = 28% College 99 = 40% Grad School 218 = 32%

I’m hoping the person who did this math would have fit in the hoping for GED grouping?


There are so many things wrong with those numbers, its not even funny.
#1. How does 218 = 32% of 379?
#2. 28 + 40 + 32 = me being a retard

EDIT: In regards to #2…Im a dumbass.

11

Another thing that just bothers the hell out of me…the race demographics

69% Caucasian 86
18% Afr. Am. 225
6% Asian 135
2% Hispanic 34
[B]5% Other 338[/B]

HOW THE HELL IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE???

12

[QUOTE=CharlotteLacrosse16;349907]#2. [B]28 + 40 + 32 = 90. [/B]Where’s the other 10%?[/QUOTE]

Um, you sure?

13

[QUOTE=ChevEE;349913]Um, you sure?[/QUOTE]

I just added it up in my head, and I think I got 100% but I’ve been out of school for a while so my brain is likely withering away.