Remember this???

I think it’s safe to say we have proved him wrong. B)

Ha ha, that’s hilarious. I’d forgotten about that.

Look at some of those schools rated higher: NC State, UNLV, Oregon, Rice, Virginia. Ha ha ha

The article didn’t even mention Eddie…

[font=Optima]Projected Conference Rank: Seventh place in the conference isn’t as bad as it seems. The top seven teams will be strong in the Conference USA. Last year, Louisville was a very talented team and ended up in sixth place in the conference. C-USA would be looking even better for the future…if we didn’t know any better.

Projected Post-season Tournament: NIT[/font]

Also he said Butter was a solid option off of the bench. :lmao:

If I did my job that poorly, I’d be fired in a heartbeat. This guy is an idiot. He’s dumb enough to be a C-USA ref.

I tried to find the old thread when we were bitching about our #62 ranking, but I guess I can’t search back that far. Maybe one of the mods can dig it up… it might make for some good reading. I know a lot of us emailed that Joel guy and posted our replies from him.

[i]Originally posted by LutzFan[/i]@Feb 17 2005, 02:17 PM [b] I tried to find the old thread when we were bitching about our #62 ranking, [/b]
[url=]#62 ranking story[/url], CHN

CHN’s “144 Teams in 144 Days”, Countdown to opening day of top 144

Thanks HP… not sure why I couldn’t find that.

For the record it looks like Nova and NLNP had the closest predictions (at the moment anyways).

Metro said #62 was accurate for us. :rolleyes:

EDIT: Found another related thread here.