UTimes Stolen?

This is very, very interesting. I never heard anything about this.

From: [URL=http://www.splc.org/newsflash.asp?id=1508&year]http://www.splc.org/newsflash.asp?id=1508&year[/URL]=

[SIZE=2] [/SIZE]

[SIZE=3][B][QUOTE]
[SIZE=3][B]Papers stolen from UNC-Charlotte after staff neglects to feature presidential candidate[/B]
[/SIZE][SIZE=2][B]
Issues returned by ‘concerned and wealthy alumni’ of the university[/B]
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=1]© 2007 Student Press Law Center[/SIZE]

April 18, 2007

[SIZE=2][B]NORTH CAROLINA [/B]— Thousands of copies of [I]The University Times[/I] were stolen from stands at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte last week after the student newspaper omitted a candidate in its campus election preview edition.

The issues were taken after the April 5 distribution, and on Monday editors found between two and three thousand copies piled at the front door of the building that houses the newspaper office, said [I]University Times[/I] Adviser Wayne Maikranz.

Editors believe the theft is a response to the newspaper’s failure to include any information about one of three candidates for student body president, including his platform and picture. They say the error stemmed from a communication failure within the editorial staff.

Attached to the pile of newspaper was a note, Maikranz said, which read: “We noticed there were some important omissions from your Thursday, April 5, publication of [I]The University Times[/I]. We thought you might like to make some corrections so we decided to return them to you.”

The note was signed by “concerned and wealthy alumni” of the university, Maikranz said.

Although campus police will continue to investigate the incident, they are not considering it a criminal matter, said William Harper, assistant chief of police and public safety at the university. He said that after conferring with the local magistrate’s office, police determined that no crime was committed.

The newspapers are free, Harper pointed out, and there was no destruction of property because the newspapers were merely moved from distribution boxes to the newspaper office. He added that school officials still could choose to pursue disciplinary action.

The newspaper includes a statement in each issue stating that the first copy is free and additional copies are 35 cents. North Carolina does not have a law explicitly criminalizing newspaper theft, but several states have successfully prosecuted free newspaper thieves under general theft statutes.

The candidate omitted from the newspaper, Justin Ritchie, said that he was not maligned for being omitted from the issue and that he was not involved with the theft in anyway.

He surmised that some unofficial campaign supporters could have been involved. Earlier in the election race, Ritche said, such supporters cased a stir when they began distributing unsanctioned campaign fliers.

“Unfortunately I cannot control my voter base when it comes to things like that,” Ritchie said.

Campus police questioned Ritchie, but they said he is not considered a suspect.

Ritchie said that he deplores the theft and that because he has friends on the[I] University Times[/I] staff, he is aware of the effort they put into producing the newspaper.

“People like that need to have an apology,” said Ritchie, who was the top vote-getter in last week’s election with 41 percent. He is now competing in the runoff election.

Soon after realizing the newspaper’s gaffe, Editor in Chief Alex O’Neill planned an election supplement issue that would identify all the candidates and, he says, make up for the error.

The newspaper staff learned of the theft after putting the effort into the developing the voting guide, which was frustrating for O’Neill.

“It just seems so irresponsible and childish and immature,” he said. “It blows my mind.”

O’Neill said he was floored that someone would believe stealing newspapers would be the logical response to the newspaper’s mistake, rather than to petition the editor with any concerns.

“Here we are in college, and you’d expect to people to have at least the common courtesy to address the person,” he said.

[I]By Brian Hudson, SPLC staff writer[/I]
[/SIZE][/QUOTE][/B][/SIZE][SIZE=2]
[/SIZE]

No one noticed anyway…they were stolen the night before our Spring Friday break. I noticed the empty cases as I walked a tour group around an empty campus.

Bleh Alex O’neal gets owned, and this time by Alumni. What a loser.

Where are the papers kept? Not inside behind a locked door?

:lmao:

[QUOTE][SIZE=2]“Here we are in college, and you’d expect to people to have at least the common courtesy to address the person,” [/SIZE][/QUOTE]

lol

[SIZE=2][QUOTE][SIZE=2]Attached to the pile of newspaper was a note, Maikranz said, which read: “We noticed there were some important omissions from your Thursday, April 5, publication of [I]The University Times[/I]. We thought you might like to make some corrections so we decided to return them to you.”[/SIZE][/QUOTE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]:lmao: :mask: :popcorn: [/SIZE]

If they wouldn’t have been returned, no one would have noticed they were gone except the people who collect the untaken copies.

sounds like something Gill would do…

When I wrote for the paper back in the 70’s, it was called the Carolina Journal. We certainly dealt with our share of strange situations but nothing approaching this.

Where are the papers kept? Not inside behind a locked door?

Somebody answer my question.

I think the papers were distrubuted throughout campus. Someone went around and collected them, then returned them to UT.

[SIZE=2]:lmao: :mask: :popcorn: [/SIZE]

I thought this was even funnier:
[SIZE=2][QUOTE][SIZE=2]The note was signed by “concerned and [B]wealthy [/B]alumni” of the university, Maikranz said.[/SIZE][/QUOTE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]Whoever did this belongs in the NNN Hall of Fame for all time.[/SIZE]

Somebody answer my question.

Well, after they’re recollected, they’re kept somewhere around the Student Media offices. Ask Gill for the real location.

Like someone mentioned before, this seems less like someone STOLE the newspaper and more like someone recollected it for the UTimes.

Well, after they're recollected, they're kept somewhere around the Student Media offices. Ask Gill for the real location.

Like someone mentioned before, this seems less like someone STOLE the newspaper and more like someone recollected it for the UTimes.

I agree. This wasn’t theft… it was relocation to the owners. University officials should get over themselves and not take something like this so seriously.

I agree. This wasn't theft... it was relocation to the owners. University officials should get over themselves and not take something like this so seriously.

I don’t think the University officials are taking this that seriously at all…almost everyone agrees the UTimes as it is right now isn’t worth the effort…

I don't think the University officials are taking this that seriously at all.....almost everyone agrees the UTimes as it is right now isn't worth the effort....

I agree it’s not worth the effort and most people agree with that, but campus officials [I]did[/I] involve the playboy police squad… so, [I]they[/I] must have taken it somewhat seriously.

Well Faago’neal probably reported it to the cops.

The extra papers are just trashed. We exposed that in pictures. Stacks and stacks are just thrown out.

Birds in the University area are deeply disturbed that they cannot perform daily pooping functions without them.

When I was in school they had a case at Maryland when someone objected to a controversial article.
In fact, I was on staff, & our Editor-In-Chier admitted to me that he & some other top school paper brass took out an insert that was paid to be in there because they didn’t like it’s political leanings. It just happened to be a pro-life insert. So even the media can sometimes violate freedom of speech & freedom of the press.