Hey it could be worse. Clemson got smacked by the committee for playing a Nineresque schedule. Finished 3rd in the ACC and got passed over. I donāt remember that happening since the tourney expanded a long time ago.
But yāall keep defending and applauding that weak ass slateā¦
Clemson lost to Louisville in ACC play. That was a killer this year. Louisville was the worst ACC team since Dwayne Morrisonās 2nd Georgia Tech team in '80-'81 according to the metrics.
That includes a Maryland team that went 0-14 in ACC play being ranked better than this yearās Cardinals.
And speaking of Forrest, a lot of players in his position would have hit the portal. Instead, embraced a smaller offensive role with the team after being the leading scorer two years ago.
Lolā¦you argue with so much nonsense Iām not even sure how to respond.
At least with the other teams you mentionedā¦we couldnāt crucify him for his EFFORT in scheduling. If he schedules those typical strong programs and they happen to have a bad yearā¦thatās not on him. At least he tried.
But I can promise youā¦when you schedule ON PURPOSE :
Coppin St
UMES
Detroit Mercyā¦and do it TWICE
Monmouth
Et al
There is a reason. No way in hell Ron thought those would be decent competition. They were scheduled to pad his wins. 1-2 per season is one thingā¦but to load up the bulk of the non-conference schedule like that is embarrassing.
If THATās the confidence he has in his team and his coaching ability is to schedule like thatā¦it says alot about his own belief in what heās doing.
I agree that the 3 cupcakes we scheduled were at least one too many though UMES not as bad as last season (#232 vs #309).
And then Monmouth crapping out and dropping 211 spots from 2022 (#140) to 2023 (#351) was unexpected.
The Detroit Mercy 2-fer hopefully an anomaly but we werenāt alone in scheduling that way in OOC.
Anyway, weāll see if moving to the AAC helps out much in the non-con sked. Canāt do anything about conference play, so hereās hoping #324 Tulsa and #288 UTSA get better soon!