Impressive, two coaches from AAC on this prestigious list.
I know we lost a lot of guys, but several of them were not that productive or didn’t see the field much.
We brought in some decent players and improved our OL and QB.
I’m not understanding why ECU gets such a boost from having some of the same problems we had, and we got demoted.
Someone explain this to me?
I worry a little bit about LB. I think we are okay everywhere else on D even though we lost Okie.
Offense should be better, not worse.
Based on those votes, they only expect us to win 1 game all season. 77 pts???
Rosinski asks Steele about the Niners around the 11:40 mark. Latter says he has ECU as the most improved team in the nation.
Its all a guess at this point, and we have no track record of success, so we will be picked low until we do, good recruiting, or not
Since there are 30 first place votes, taking that means 30 media types voted. Exactly who and how that breaks down is something of a mystery - especially as to whether or not there was a QC media member among the 30 casting ballots.
Anyway, Matt Baker of the Tampa Bay Tribune on how he voted:
50 to 1 odds to win the conference championship? Are we in the right conference?…… maybe we should form a Board with a former AD and successful experienced college football coach to guide and help us build a successful football program that is competitive. I am sure there are these people qualified and available & maybe retired that we could use as consultants, it would eventually pay for itself with success.
Its all a guess at this point, and mostly based off last season. I wouldn’t get too worked up about it
Yep. And a closer read indicates most likely AI generated. Definitely wasn’t run by a proofreader with any recent knowledge of realignment.
I’m still worried that the CFP selection committee may consider Oregan State and Wazzu P5 and give one of them the slot if they have good seasons.