FYI: The posts following this one, LAN, are a response to your breaking of the unwritten rule: We don’t call girls out on the messageboard. Once a girl is ‘outted’ all that happens is every guy wants to talk to them.
So let’s just pretend this never happened. Besides, there was no proof given that NLP is a girl. Except if you go to tailgates. In which case… keep your mouth shut.
Like starting threads to try to get people to say things that would get them banned?
Actually saw people were discussing this in the shout box J Felt.
And satire is not childish. If it’s done properly. But green tinted asses is not.[/quote]
It’s funny that you call people girls when you have the most prominent meninges on the board. Ask your mom what those are when she turns out the basement light tonight.
The Pulitzer committee is like the academy awards.
Faulkner wrote “As I Lay Dying” in 1930. Winner of Pulitzer for novel “Laughing Boy” by Oliver Lafarge. Who?
Faulkner did win for “A Fable” and “The Reivers” minor works
Hemingway “A Farewell to Arms” 1929 Winner “Scarlet Sister Mary” by Julia Peterkin
Hemingway did win “The Old Man and the Sea” a novella entertaining but a minor work
They often reward people long after they should. Or they don’t recognize them at all. Mailer won for “Executioner Song” a popular novel. List could go on.
[quote=“LiberalAtheistNiner, post:25, topic:26588”]The Pulitzer committee is like the academy awards.
Faulkner wrote “As I Lay Dying” in 1930. Winner of Pulitzer for novel “Laughing Boy” by Oliver Lafarge. Who?
Faulkner did win for “A Fable” and “The Reivers” minor works
Hemingway “A Farewell to Arms” 1929 Winner “Scarlet Sister Mary” by Julia Peterkin
Hemingway did win “The Old Man and the Sea” a novella entertaining but a minor work
They often reward people long after they should. Or they don’t recognize them at all. Mailer won for “Executioner Song” a popular novel. List could go on.[/quote]
One of my favorite songs is “A Manic Depressive Named Laughing Boy”
This guy is the best. For everything he denounces us for he steps right out and does it himself with the name calling, baiting, crappy satire, and all.
As for the website not being serious, I don’t think you’ll find any of us who take it as the Bible (or whatever is the good book for you Atheists, Time Magazine?). Sadly, when we updated the site we removed the “About Us” that explained that we do it as fun and we put our own spin of humor on it. We’re not alone in doing this as their are many sites that do it better and worse then us (if you can believe that). I will agree with you that the material and humor would be better if the team and program were doing better. That’s just common sense as it provides more source material. I have told you numerous times that we welcome constructive criticism, but I’ve yet to see any from you.
So by all means, please continue down this road. We will enjoy it, and I’m sure you will too.