NCAA Eligibility rules challenged

Not yet.

1 Like

Yeah, no telling what may be allowed the way things are going!

That post was fake. If you google him there was no news about this and he was playing yesterday in a pro game.

Been a rash of fake posts. Guess it can get boring being in the basement so much.

https://x.com/WinterSportsLaw/status/1989180058381263170?t=YyjNm-cdhHouD_JV6XqAag&s=19

https://x.com/MattBrownEP/status/1989054046234145225

A post was merged into an existing topic: 2025 College Football :football:

https://x.com/WinterSportsLaw/status/1993379085582782856

So this gives athletes more power against the NCAA??

This latest ruling is confusing as some are reporting it as an NCAA victory.

https://x.com/FOS/status/1993447105449402584

BTW, Elad isn’t seeking another year. Just wanting to finish out his college career, which may or may not end tomorrow since Rutgers (5-6) needs win to get bowl eligible.

https://x.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/1994495704786768133

Why was this even a thing. Why were they trying to keep him out of the game?

Edit. Never Mind.

I read it.

And it sort of made sense.

Doesn’t seem like it should be this difficult.

https://x.com/WinterSportsLaw/status/1999913405398835360

https://x.com/ByPatForde/status/2000589012885479440

https://x.com/WinterSportsLaw/status/2000675934152659246

Is this decision solely on how many years a player has to complete their 4 years of eligibility, or does it ask for more than 4 years of eligibility?

Asking 5 for 5. D2 already moving towards that on their own.

1 Like

5 for 5 would be more consistent with the typical college student.

1 Like

https://x.com/i/status/2000711164641030493

3 Likes

So if the redshirt is 5 in 6?

if they redshirt and have an injury exception year it’s 5 in 7?