2009-10 A-10 Men's Hoops Predictions

Figured I’d start a thread compiling all of the predictions (with additions and updates as they come along)…

Atlantic 10 Conference (coaches and media)

  1. Dayton (33)
  2. Xavier (18)
  3. Richmond (4)
  4. La Salle (2)
  5. Duquesne
    (tie) Temple
    7. Charlotte
  6. Rhode Island
  7. UMass
  8. Saint Joseph’s
  9. St . Bonaventure
  10. Saint Louis
  11. George Washington
  12. Fordham

Charlotte Observer - Jim Utter

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
    4. Charlotte
  4. Duquesne
  5. Temple
  6. Rhode Island
  7. Saint Louis
  8. Massachusetts
  9. La Salle
  10. Saint Joseph’s
  11. St. Bonaventure
  12. Fordham
  13. George Washington

CollegeChalkTalk.com

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. Temple
  5. La Salle
  6. Duquesne
    7. Charlotte
  7. Rhode Island
  8. UMass
  9. St. Bonaventure
  10. Saint Joseph’s
  11. Saint Louis
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Daily Hampshire Gazette (UMass) - Matt Vautour

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. La Salle
  5. Duquesne
  6. Temple
    7. Charlotte
  7. UMass
  8. St. Bonaventure
  9. Rhode Island
  10. Saint Joseph’s
  11. Saint Louis
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Athlon Sports

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Duquesne
  4. Richmond
  5. La Salle
  6. Temple
  7. UMass
  8. Rhode Island
    9. Charlotte
  9. St. Bonaventure
  10. Saint Joseph’s
  11. Saint Louis
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

BleacherReport.com - Jameson Fleming

  1. Dayton
  2. Richmond
  3. La Salle
  4. Xavier
    5. Charlotte
  5. Duquesne
  6. Temple
  7. Rhode Island
  8. UMass
  9. Saint Joseph’s
  10. St. Bonaventure
  11. Fordham
  12. George Washington
  13. Saint Louis

Blue Ribbon

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. La Salle
  5. Duquesne
  6. UMass
  7. Temple
    8. Charlotte
  8. URI
  9. Bona
  10. St. Joe’s
  11. Saint Louis
  12. GW
  13. Fordham

CollegeHoops.net - Joel Welser

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. La Salle
  4. Richmond
  5. Duquesne
  6. Saint Louis
  7. Saint Joseph’s
  8. Temple
    9. Charlotte
  9. Rhode Island

ESPN.com - Fran Franschilla

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. La Salle
  5. Duquesne
  6. Temple
    7. Charlotte
  7. St. Bonaventure
  8. UMass
  9. Rhode Island
  10. Saint Louis
  11. Saint Joseph’s
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Lindy’s Sports

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. La Salle
  5. UMass
  6. Temple
  7. Duquesne
  8. St. Bonaventure
  9. Rhode Island
  10. St. Joe’s
    11. Charlotte
  11. Saint Louis
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Rivals.com

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. La Salle
  4. Richmond
  5. Duquesne
  6. Temple
    7. Charlotte
  7. Rhode Island
  8. Saint Joseph’s
  9. UMass
  10. Saint Louis
  11. St. Bonaventure
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Rush the Court - Joseph Dzuback

  1. Dayton (14-2)
  2. Richmond (12-4)
  3. Xavier (11-5)
  4. La Salle (11-5)
  5. Duquesne (10-6)
    6. Charlotte (9-7)
  6. Temple (9-7)
    8.Massachusetts (8-8)
  7. Rhode Island (7-9)
  8. George Washington (6-10)
  9. St. Bonaventure (5-11)
  10. Saint Louis (4-12)
  11. Saint Joseph’s (4-12)
  12. Fordham (2-14)

Sportsnetwork.com – Pat Taggart

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. La Salle
  5. Temple
  6. UMass
  7. Saint Joseph’s
  8. Duquesne
    9. Charlotte
  9. St. Bonaventure
  10. Rhode Island
  11. Saint Louis
  12. George Washington
  13. Fordham

Sporting News/Street & Smith’s

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. Richmond
  4. Temple
  5. Duquesne
    6. Charlotte
  6. La Salle
  7. URI
  8. UMass
  9. St. Joe’s
  10. Saint Louis
  11. Bona
  12. GW
  13. Fordham


USA Today

  1. Dayton
  2. Xavier
  3. La Salle
  4. Temple
  5. Richmond
  6. Duquesne
    7. Charlotte
  7. Bona
  8. URI
  9. UMass
  10. St. Joe’s
  11. GW
  12. Saint Louis
  13. Fordham

utter’s is the most accurate.

UMass beatwriter Matt Vautour reveals his A-10 picks, including all-conference for DiJuan Harris and Chris Braswell.

[b]7. Charlotte[/b] - In theory I could have ranked the 49ers higher, but I'm unconvinced at Charlotte's ability to put together a good year in the league under Bobby Lutz.
GazetteNet.com: [b][url=http://www.gazettenet.com/node/245392]Atlantic 10 Preseason Ballot[/url][/b]

I’d rather they give us low expectations.

Is there any respect for Lutz in the A10 circle?

[QUOTE=eason49;432407]Is there any respect for Lutz in the A10 circle?[/QUOTE]

should there be?

UMass beatwriter Matt Vautour reveals his A-10 picks, including all-conference for DiJuan Harris and Chris Braswell.

GazetteNet.com: Atlantic 10 Preseason Ballot

He’s still made we knocked them out of the tounry Lee’s senior year. We did finish second in the league the first year we were in it… can’t say much since.

He's still made we knocked them out of the tounry Lee's senior year. We did finish second in the league the first year we were in it... can't say much since.

How is he showing any type of bias? He included our freshman into the All-Conference list, and didn’t include a guy like Murray who was rated higher than Chris on almost every list.

Also, #7 is about what everyone is picking us at sans Jim Utter.

Yeah, I don’t think #7 is a terribly unreasonable assumption for our team. Especially before we see how they play together. Lots of assumptions made about this team that may or may not pan out.

Updated to include Lindy’s, which so far is the lowest prediction for the Niners at 11th.

Hooty High Brow Vick:lmao: told me this is the year Bobby gets the boys turned in the right direction.:49ers:

Updated to include Lindy's, which so far is the lowest prediction for the Niners at 11th.

Hard to believe Lindy’s dissed us like that! I noticed that one of the publications I was reading yesterday made it perfectly clear that Lutz had to win this year or he’s out. They never specified whether that means NCAA’s or bust or just winning more than half our games. Either way I guess you can’t get too angry about the predicted standings if you go by what the team has done the last couple seasons.

Either way I guess you can't get too angry about the predicted standings if you go by what the team has done the last couple seasons.

Sure you can, we won close to 20 games two years ago and were decimated with injuries last year, 11th is a slap in the face! If everyone is here and healthy (hard thing for us) we won’t do worse than 7th.

I definitely feel that 11th is waaay too low. To be honest Lindy’s has never given us much respect anyway. They down played us when we were in Conference USA and making the NCAA’s on a regular basis.

[QUOTE=bball49er;432779]Hooty High Brow Vick:lmao: told me this is the year Bobby gets the boys turned in the right direction.:49ers:[/QUOTE]

A BBALL SIGHTING!!!

I am cautiously optimistic about this year, but I can see why no one other than us would think so.

Like I’ve said in the past…preseason rankings only matter to Dayton.

Hard to believe Lindy's dissed us like that! I noticed that one of the publications I was reading yesterday made it perfectly clear that Lutz had to win this year or he's out. They never specified whether that means NCAA's or bust or just winning more than half our games. Either way I[B] guess you can't get too angry about the predicted standings if you go by what the team has done the last couple seasons[/B].

If you only had to do this----why do we need these so-called “experts”? The whole point is these guys are getting paid to research the teams and then make sound judgements/prognostications----clearly many do very little research.

A BBALL SIGHTING!!!!!!

I am cautiously optimistic about this year, but I can see why no one other than us would think so.

I can’t.

If you only had to do this----why do we need these so-called "experts"? The whole point is these guys are getting paid to research the teams and then make sound judgements/prognostications----clearly many do very little research.

exactly… especially when http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=991724
“xavier is too established to be a mid-major”

[QUOTE=eason49;432407]Is there any respect for Lutz in the A10 circle?[/QUOTE]

The respect was not there in CUSA, either. The difference was that we kicked some @$$ for most of our tenure there and never cared what the others tought about us. We just need to start doing the same in the A10.