I agree, but I also won’t be surprised if the NCAA starts defending the tarhole’s actions as pressure from other sources begin to accelerate.
clt expects a MOAB type hit on CHeat athletics.
BS for the agent to get in trouble, but no one else at UNC-CH does.
Who thinks Louisville will get a bigger penalty for consensual sex with escorts than North Carolina does for 20 years of fake academics?
I believe UNC was punished for that and the players were kicked off the team
If I raise both hands, does it count as 2 votes?
Mojo, they didn’t get probation & a fine from the court.
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?
oh
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?[/quote]
clt says most SEC schools are above CHeat in the NCAA rankings.
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?[/quote]
Yeah I know a bunch that think that.
But I guarantee you a lot crap goes on in SEC football that goes unpunished.
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?[/quote]
Yeah I know a bunch that think that.
But I guarantee you a lot crap goes on in SEC football that goes unpunished.[/quote]
You need to discuss the SEC schools in the thread that discusses SEC schools. This thread is about UNC-CHeat. To my knowledge, no SEC school has been busted for offering fake classes to athletes for 20 years.
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?[/quote]
Yeah I know a bunch that think that.
But I guarantee you a lot crap goes on in SEC football that goes unpunished.[/quote]
You need to discuss the SEC schools in the thread that discusses SEC schools. This thread is about UNC-CHeat. To my knowledge, no SEC school has been busted for offering fake classes to athletes for 20 years.[/quote]
Actually I would rather discuss Charlotte 49ers
Ok gotcha.
How much money you think exchanges hands with SEC football?[/quote]
But SEC schools have been punished when they have been caught. Tarhole fans seem to be the only ones that think their s*** doesn’t stink. Don’t you agree?[/quote]
Yeah I know a bunch that think that.
But I guarantee you a lot crap goes on in SEC football that goes unpunished.[/quote]
You need to discuss the SEC schools in the thread that discusses SEC schools. This thread is about UNC-CHeat. To my knowledge, no SEC school has been busted for offering fake classes to athletes for 20 years.[/quote]
Actually I would rather discuss Charlotte 49ers[/quote]
Did you know you are in the wrong thread for that?
UNC-CHeat has responded to the third Notice of Allegations.
The Duke Basketball Report reaction to the above article. I reference it because it contains numerous links to other articles.
I never would have predicted the drama of what is likely to be an epic showdown where the NCAA actually fights for its credibility, if not its existence. UNC-CH has pushed all of its chips in and could not be more defiant, seemingly eliminating the chance for a moderate outcome where hands would be slapped. In a strange twist, it is being reported that Kenneth Wainstein, the author of the second report on the Tar Heels fraud has been interviewed for the FBI Director position. If appointed, would he be available to testify before the NCAA? How would that impact this case? His report has the supporting evidence so maybe it is no big deal, but it is untimely.
[quote=“Nugget, post:1858, topic:28477”]UNC-CHeat has responded to the third Notice of Allegations.
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/luke-decock/article152660089.html
The Duke Basketball Report reaction to the above article. I reference it because it contains numerous links to other articles.
http://www.dukebasketballreport.com/2017/5/26/15696112/uncs-reaction-to-the-ncaa-go-to-heel-letter-of-allegations?src=rss
I never would have predicted the drama of what is likely to be an epic showdown where the NCAA actually fights for its credibility, if not its existence. UNC-CH has pushed all of its chips in and could not be more defiant, seemingly eliminating the chance for a moderate outcome where hands would be slapped. In a strange twist, it is being reported that Kenneth Wainstein, the author of the second report on the Tar Heels fraud has been interviewed for the FBI Director position. If appointed, would he be available to testify before the NCAA? How would that impact this case? His report has the supporting evidence so maybe it is no big deal, but it is untimely.[/quote] I’m not sure I understand how UNC-Cheat can argue the lack of institutional control charge, it’s clearly a systems failure that this went on so long and to such a severe degree, if that doesn’t apply then none of the NCAA bylaws apply. If they get off in court, then the blue print for every other blue blood is in place to cheat with abandon, and then say the NCAA has no jurisdiction. I agree that this is going to undermine NCAA authority completely if UNC-Cheat doesn’t end up with harsher penalties now.
On a side note: It’s amazing that every single time I’ve come across a N&O article on the Cheats, there are 30 - 50 comments defending the cheating by that same guy, Jeff Franklin. He appears to be a one-person troll army, wonder if he’s paid to do it by someone associated with the Cheats.
If Cheat’s argument is that the NCAA only has jurisdiction over athletics and not over academics, then does it not follow that Cheat does not consider its athletes to be students? What am I missing here? Seems truly Orwellian to me.