College athlete compensation - NIL etc 💰

Haha 10m over 3 years?

Where the F is that money coming from? Thats a quarter of our total budget. I know mikes plan was to use the conference media money plus the gambling money - I don’t think that’s going to cover 3.5ish a year. If scholarships count maybe we can cover the gap.

Either way it’s a good thing we are used to losing - don’t see it changing to sustained winning anytime soon since this is the minimum - to win it’s going to take more. Likely a lot more.

Also how are navy and army handling this???

6 Mil a year for BB alone barely gets you in the top third of B10.
Last year Louisville was promoting having 6M a year for BB to lure a good coach to the ACC.

What happens when we hit the economic slowdown it looks like we are heading for and university research and grant money are being cut?
Enquiring minds want to know!!!

Definitely worried about the “assault” on education and how that’s going to affect things, especially one that’s being led by an ECU grad. Ironic? Perhaps not.

1 Like

jon stewart smh GIF

The article said they are exempt.

1 Like

Yep, as service academies, they are not allowed to offer NIL, etc.

Thanks I missed that

Surprised as well that we or the other State schools accepted this. They must of negotiated the number down in order to agree.

Be interesting to know the original number proposed.

Trying to keep Memphis & Tulane happy may be a reason it was proposed.

Memphis is gone. Just a matter of when.

1 Like

If we are expected to spend 10 million over the next 3 years on NIL, then I expect better tv money from our conference on the next tv deal. The pressure should be on our conference commissioner to make it happen! We are expected to make this happen!

1 Like

In this conference? Ha!

No excuses! If we are expected to step up, then the commissioner needs to do his part!

1 Like

The current AAC TV contract with ESPN runs through 2031-32. So nothing gonna happen until then and that comes in between Big Ten and SEC contracts being renewed.

Also. If this applies to everyone is everyone getting a full revenue share? Are we there yet?

I’m not so sure.

What do they bring to the table for a P4?

Cal and Stanford had to make massive concessions and SMU had to buy their way in.

If Memphis doesn’t increase TV revenue for a conference they aren’t going anywhere.

1 Like

Didn’t say Memphis will go to a P4. Just saying they’re leaving. Scott was hired to facilitate such a move.

I am just saying, the more the commissioner expects from us the more I expect from him.

Pernetti per his bosses doesn’t really expect anything. $10 million from multiple sources over a 3 year period when there will be schools spending $20.5M annually on rev share alone?

Like his predecessor, mostly hot air.

I am pretty sure about half the American team are already at 3 million and then there are the teams that aren’t. Mostly the CUSA transition teams. I think this was a statement for programs like us to say we are going to step it up. Honestly, the American is light years ahead of where we were in CUSA. Remember the tournament with the big curtain… Unless we go regional this is as good as we can hope for given our performance.

I absolutely detest NIL. I will not give. If others do more power to you. Now if we sell something that I want and the proceeds go to NIL that is different. Programs like ECU have done this to boost NIL. Instead we just ask the same people like me to give more for the same product or worse. I think Albin is going to help football. Basketball I don’t know. Baseball and softball are definitely entertaining programs. I want us to succeed badly but I only have so much to give.

The problem is, the league doesn’t discuss specifics about payouts.

That said, we knew some general things about the payouts. When UConn, Cincy, Houston and UCF were in the league the teams were all getting around $7-$8 million per, IIRC.

When they left and the CUSA teams were added, there was some discussion if that would trigger an option for ESPN to renegotiate the gross payout. This is when things got really murky. The league lost 4 of its stronger brands and replaced them with 6 weaker ones (more mouths to feed too). The legacy teams got assurances that their payouts wouldn’t be affected, but I never saw a confirmation that the gross payout for the entire league was unchanged, which led me to believe it was and we had a very hush hush unequal revenue sharing agreement afterwards. The CUSA schools supposedly started at $1 million each but were supposed to be gradually stepped up over the next 3-5 years.

So to the point made above, I don’t think our commish can expect an equal payout floor without having equal revenues. Unless ESPN stepped up its payouts accordingly, that would probably mean the unequal allocation would have to be leveled back out.

I don’t know what happened. I just know it’s ridiculous to have unequal revenue sharing with equal minimum spending requirements. That doesn’t make sense.

1 Like