Conference Realignment

https://x.com/PrivateerSports/status/2072379187747336254

Same color scheme?

Did not expect that. Ughh. That would be like if we were tarhole blue…

Ryan Reynolds Want GIF

1 Like

clt says that right there is reason number 3232923894289482 for a name change!

https://x.com/SouthlandSports/status/2072379396724256937

2 Likes

Normmm asks Ghostofclt why Elisabeth Shue was a speaker at the LSUNO announcement?

clt haș no clue

That’s actually Jeanette Weiland, who is the interim chancellor at LSUNO.

1 Like

LSU Medical school is in Nola, $2b+ campus with a VA, also includes some of the Tulane Med school in that facility.

In addition to the School of Medicine, LSU Health Care New Orleans also includes:

• School of Allied Health Professions
• School of Dentistry
• School of Graduate Studies
• School of Nursing
• School of Public Health

Plus it’s affiliated with University Medical Center New Orleans.

wow, impressive investigation!

https://x.com/i/status/2076414717543784564

1 Like

I’m sure they are.

but unless it’s gonna make the big 12 more money or the big 12 has to backfill it’s not gonna happen.

and they would still have to beat out other contenders like Wash St, USF, etc.

the NFL is going to use the change of control provision to take their CBS held rights back to market as soon as the paramount deal is finalized. That could also happen with NBC if they get bought.

What I’m hearing on the pods is that top level broadcasters are going to be saving their money to stay in or get into the NFL.

It’s possible CFB has maxed out TV value at the low and mid tier and the only way for the top tier to get more would be to start a new ā€œsuper leagueā€.

Which they will have trouble doing until their current TV deals are over.

I’m guessing status quo until the TV deals are almost done and then either we will get a super league or tradition will rule.

From what I’m hearing we are 4 years away from something actually being announced.

if the conferences get really cutthroat and cost conscious I think we may see regionalization for everything but basketball and football.

It could be organized geographically to limit travel for all D1 sports other than those two.

In that case I could see them naming the ā€œconferencesā€ NCAA D1 Group 1,2,3 etc.

Regionalization for non revenue sports is ridiculously past due. It makes no sense to fly volleyball players across the country for a match played in front of a dozen fans.

Will see about the rest. Your time frames are probably accurate.

5 Likes

https://x.com/i/status/2079197435423789103

1 Like

https://x.com/i/status/2079188220558925922

Just when you think things couldn’t get any dumber! :roll_eyes: :winking_face_with_tongue:

1 Like

Here’s what I don’t get, the general idea is that government is getting involved, to make laws, to make college sports better. But…we’re going to let the SEC/B10 tell us what the law/s should be.

I really don’t understand how we’ve gotten so far that lawmakers don’t say F you, that’s not how this is going to work.

Also, the 19 schools cap could be telling. It’s hard to tell if that is only referring to the Sec and B10, or to every conference. If it’s only for the SEC and B10, it get’s the number close of 38 to what some have speculated for a new division. Although 38 is an odd number, compared to say 36, 40, 44 or 48 for creating divisions.

If it’s including the ACC and B12, that’s 76 schools. If it’s including PAC, that’s 95 scools.

I think the # they are debating is 76, which probably leaves us on the outside, barring a meteoric rise.

I still think that anything over about 40 is dead weight from a proportional standpoint. Schools 41-76 are much closer to the 77+ schools in terms of budget / finances / interest than they are the top programs. I also don’t think they can generate sufficient revenue to make carrying them on a huge media rights contract viable .

https://x.com/McCannSportsLaw/status/2079250316206252090