I can't believe 80% of this board thinks we will be 10-7 or BETTER.
They obviously think beating the POWERHOUSE of Wofford solved our problemsâŚ
I can't believe 80% of this board thinks we will be 10-7 or BETTER.
They obviously think beating the POWERHOUSE of Wofford solved our problemsâŚ
[QUOTE=HP49er;207813]16-13, and being optimistic.[/QUOTE]
dit-toe.
Despite the A-10 being pretty bad this year, itâs just hard to look at our schedule and find more than 7-8 conference wins. Not suggesting we canât better that but on paper, Iâm just having a hard time finding enough wins to get us over .500. Hopefully, weâve turned the corner and Iâm proven wrong. But I think weâll have a tough time winning more than 2 (St. Joeâs/@ Richmond) of our next 7. And even those two arenât gimmes. Our first half of the A-10 schedule is really, really tough.
[QUOTE=LeftyNiner;207812]Howâs everyone feeling about the rest of the season? 6-6 with 17 to play.[/QUOTE]
why is the godfather of âhalf glass fullâ not weighing in on his prediction?
[QUOTE=metro;207937]why is the godfather of âhalf glass fullâ not weighing in on his prediction?[/QUOTE]
Oh, my bad. I voted for 18-11.
[QUOTE=LeftyNiner;207940]Oh, my bad. I voted for 18-11.[/QUOTE]
12-5 the rest of the season? I certainly hope so.
Serious question to you is, do you really believe that? Or are you just trying to live up to your roll as the ultimate optimist.
you think a basketball squad that loses to Davidson by 30, can go 12-5 in the A10?
[QUOTE=metro;207944]you think a basketball squad that loses to Davidson by 30, can go 12-5 in the A10?[/QUOTE]
Nothing. But then again, Colby and Mt St Maryâs donât play in the A10, so whatâs your point?
BTW - Davidsonâs RPI is 28. Watch the SoCon effect take place now.
[QUOTE=metro;207944]12-5 the rest of the season? I certainly hope so.
Serious question to you is, do you really believe that? Or are you just trying to live up to your roll as the ultimate optimist.
you think a basketball squad that loses to Davidson by 30, can go 12-5 in the A10?[/QUOTE]
You mean role? Itâs no role my 49er brother. :unsure: Yes. Iâve actually watched the games. We can go 12-5 if everyone stays healthy and we play team ball like we did vs Wofford. Read the Damn Proud thread before you go into the âyouâre getting excited over Woffordâ rant. If we play like we did against Davidson or Houston, then no.
Why are you bothered by optimism, btw? Itâs as if you want our athletic program to fail.
19 wins, this looking at the schedule. The A-10 is way down and we are playing better!
[QUOTE=NinerAdvocate;207945]Nothing. But then again, Colby and Mt St Maryâs donât play in the A10, so whatâs your point?
BTW - Davidsonâs RPI is 28. Watch the SoCon effect take place now.[/QUOTE]
whats my point? Iâll slow down for you:
when you lose to Davidson by 30, you probably suck, and most likely wonât go 12-5 in conference play. Thats my point.
[QUOTE=metro;207944]you think a basketball squad that loses to Davidson by 30, can go 12-5 in the A10?[/QUOTE]
Metro, the way we have played â plus that of our fellow A-10 conference mates â I could see us winning 10 league games, though if we lost 10 games, I wouldnât be surprised either. The only consistency I have seen is inconsistency. Xavier should be, at worst, 12-1, instead of 9-4. Dayton has surprised at 10-3, but has proven to be mediocre on the road. Saint Lous, UMass, and GW are performing pretty much as expected, though the Colonials let one slip away they should have won at USC. The biggest underachievers thus far would have to Charlotte, Fordham, and the aforementioned Xavier. Just frustrating across the board.
[QUOTE=LeftyNiner;207946]You mean role? Itâs no role my 49er brother. :unsure: Yes. Iâve actually watched the games. We can go 12-5 if everyone stays healthy and we play team ball like we did vs Wofford. Read the Damn Proud thread before you go into the âyouâre getting excited over Woffordâ rant. If we play like we did against Davidson or Houston, then no.
Why are you bothered by optimism, btw? Itâs as if you want our athletic program to fail.[/QUOTE]
easy its ok to typoâŚ
I am not bothered by optimism, I just try to be a voice of freakin reason. I stated I hope we go 18-12. Look, I just bought 4 season tix, so you and NA can throw away your little âmetro wants us to failâ theory. Why would I want to drive 45 minutes to watch us lose, get realistic.
I just see a 6-6 team that on paper and TV⌠is average. Then again, the A10 is so bad 12-5 could be possible. Sadly, 18-10 probably gives us an rpi of 120-130, where we used to come in around 50 rpi.
[QUOTE=metro;207953]easy its ok to typoâŚ
I just bought 4 season tix,
[/QUOTE]
Glad to have you back on board. Out of curiosity, what did you think about Sundayâs game?
I guess if you havenât seen us play until then you wouldnât have anything to compare us to, but I promise, we were greatly improved.
The A10 is having their worst year probably in the history of that conference, so if we play like we did Sunday, we could be âdecentâ⌠Maybe.
[QUOTE=Over40NINER;207957]Glad to have you back on board. Out of curiosity, what did you think about Sundayâs game?
I guess if you havenât seen us play until then you wouldnât have anything to compare us to, but I promise, we were greatly improved.
The A10 is having their worst year probably in the history of that conference, so if we play like we did Sunday, we could be âdecentâ⌠Maybe.[/QUOTE]
couldnât go Sunday, had New Years Eve commitments w/ family.
[QUOTE=metro;207948]whats my point? Iâll slow down for you:
when you lose to Davidson by 30, you probably suck, and most likely wonât go 12-5 in conference play. Thats my point.[/QUOTE]
This just in genious - we didnt lose to Davidson by 30.
You probably need to slow down some more. Or get your glove back out and staple it to your head.
we didnt lose to Davidson by 30.
Heâs right metroâŚwe lost by 28
[QUOTE=Savio;207978]Heâs right metroâŚwe lost by 28 [/QUOTE]
oops. sorryâŚ28.
stupid me.
we must of had a junk layup at the buzzer.
Since youâre all about speed metro, hereâs how my post worked:
It was a mockery of your predilection for hyperbole, which contained the embedded playful taunt of the irony of your condescending tone regarding Leftyâs alleged lack of a grasp on reality.
But since Iâm the slow one, apparently the fault for your error is mine. Apologies.
[QUOTE=NinerAdvocate;207990]Since youâre all about speed metro, hereâs how my post worked:
It was a mockery of your predilection for hyperbole, which contained the embedded playful taunt of the irony of your condescending tone regarding Leftyâs alleged lack of a grasp on reality.
But since Iâm the slow one, apparently the fault for your error is mine. Apologies.[/QUOTE]
thank you Reverend Jackson
[QUOTE=metro;207994]thank you Reverend Jackson[/QUOTE]
Not bad. Not bad at all.