[quote=“49or bust, post:40, topic:23828”][quote=“NinerAdvocate, post:39, topic:23828”][quote=“49or bust, post:37, topic:23828”][quote=“unccccc, post:32, topic:23828”]I think Atlanta is the new Atlanta. Charlotte will never become Atlanta, unless it is divided into a 10’X53’ grid and shipped to Fulton county Georgia. But unless that happens I wouldn’t concern myself with becoming Atlanta. Atlanta isn’t that great of a city any way, so who cares? I mean if you are a huge fan of sprawling skyscrapers, traffic and extreme heat ATL is your place.
Personally I like charlotte it’s a nice city, it has potential, but it is definitely not metropolitan by any stretch of the imagination. Right now all it has is some nice rich neighborhoods, a pedestrianless cityscape and some interesting places here and there. And even if Charlotte is declared better by the mayor of Nashville is that going to improve your life? Probably not. So what is with all these comparisons?[/quote]
Dude’s trollin.[/quote]
Actually, I kinda agree with him. Aside from the fact that they can actually get bands I’d pay to see, I prefer Charlotte. Just too hot and way too much traffic there.[/quote]
So when you go downtown, you never see tons of people on the streets? And Atlanta has WAY more skyscrapers than Charlotte? Charlotte isn’t even close to the definition of metropolitan, but Atlanta is? All we have is some rich neighborhoods? Are you serious?
HIS NAME IS “UNCCCCC!”[/quote]
the name is bullshit, and he’s a little over the top saying charlotte isn’t at all a Metropolis (it’s not, but it’s also not some bumpkin burgh either) - but folks in Atlanta like to brag about their 3 separate skylines… while they’re stuck in miles of traffic in the 95 degree heat.
Atlanta is a fun place to visit, but unless you live very close to work, it’s a miserable place to have to live in. Just way too congested and hot. Chicago has some heinous traffic, but Atlanta’s might be worse.