Now trying to remember which thread I put this in when first reported. 
“it’s okay… I’ll just post it and Run will figure out where it goes” - Me. every. time.
3 Likes
After mulling it over, probably best to keep this thread. Otherwise, similar postings would just get lost in the compensation thread.
It’s coming ……
Just a matter of time….
No secret that Pavia’s motivation in this lawsuit is monetary, which is why I put the original story in the Compensation/ NIL thread. And now it’s “lost” in there somewhere.
Anyway, will be interesting to see how many JuCos benefit if the ruling is expanded to cover all of those athletes.
There it is.
Unlimited Eligibility.
3 Likes
Jones getting ahead of things. Today’s ruling applies exclusively to Pavia.
clt says let’s run it back with Reynolds this fall!
3 Likes
Well, this is just Bull S&#T and saying they are playing college ball is just a farse.
Need to just drop all the academic BS stop acting like education matters and make them paid employees do as long as they want.
The next lawsuit will be FCS shouldn’t count if you move to FBS. After that it’s any restrictions on eligibility. The excitement surrounding the CFP expansion (and resulting higher ratings) is masking the rot that has infiltrated the sport. It is unsustainable in its current form.
2 Likes
I find the CFP expansion hype to be hilarious. As if the FCS haven’t been doing this for decades now. This isn’t novel or incredible
3 Likes
Also, the ruling for eligibility should be so easy. “How many years of college sports have you played in the NCAA?” “Have you ever played at a professional level?”
Tulane law professor chiming in: