Thatâs because they never win those games. If they had beaten Duke, Gonzaga and New Mexico they would surely get an at large. I also said âto a lesser degreeâ because I donât think they schedule enough of those games. Temple and Xavier play a ton of good teams in the non-conference.
This year, X played Butler (previously scheduled non-conference game), @Purdue, Vandy, Cincy (neutral site) , @Tenn, and @Wake. So 6 tough resume building non-conference games.
Now some of those programs are down this year, but typically those games help a resume. Sometimes the committee will just give you extra credit for trying to challenge yourself, whether or not the teams you played were up to the standard tradition of the program. X didnât win enough of them this year to get an at-large, but are always in the mix because of scheduling like this.
Temple played 4 good games (down from previous years) @Nova, Duke (in NJ), Syracuse (MSG), and @Kansas. They won half of those and were considered locks for the NCAAs for most of the season.
Gonzaga played 5 Big 12 schools and beat them all. But lost to Illinois and Butler. Played a soft conference schdule (St Maryâs only other decent team), blew through it and got a 1 seed.
The formula is pretty simple. Schedule 5-6 big games, win 2 or 3, win most of your sorry conference games and you will look pretty for the committee.[/quote] Davidson has to play pretty much all those games on the road. Winning road games is much tougher, especially OOC, than people give credit for. I think the adjustments teams make for playing on the road (softer D, less aggressive in general) obscure just how big an advantage home court is when the refs donât respect you, because you only see the foul counts at the end when you try to quantify this stuff, not the style forced on the teams playing. Xavier and Temple regularly get some of those OOC games at home, so the OOC is not quite as brutal.
I think CUSA will probably be a borderline 1-3 bid conference similar to the A10 when Charlotte first entered it, with the top teams not quite elite most years and the bottom teams being gigantic anchors. I was happy to see MTSU get an NCAA bid, but it wouldâve been better to see Southern Miss get one too, as that is the kind of result I think will be typical for at-large candidates out of CUSA.