Student Secction Solution

In their defense, I wouldn’t stay to watch that shit either.

I like this idea. And to counter Eason, it wouldnt have to be in a prime spot. It could be Section 110 where no one sits anyways or one of those other empty sections behind the goals. Just make it an option that is explicitly for alumni who want to be part of an high energy atmosphere.

I like this idea. And to counter Eason, it wouldnt have to be in a prime spot. It could be Section 110 where no one sits anyways or one of those other empty sections behind the goals. Just make it an option that is explicitly for alumni who want to be part of an high energy atmosphere.[/quote]
Young alumni should not get priority over older alumni. (Unless they have donated more.)

I like this idea. And to counter Eason, it wouldnt have to be in a prime spot. It could be Section 110 where no one sits anyways or one of those other empty sections behind the goals. Just make it an option that is explicitly for alumni who want to be part of an high energy atmosphere.[/quote]
Young alumni should not get priority over older alumni. (Unless they have donated more.)[/quote]

Yeah there is not a good way to put alumni down there. Young alumni shouldn’t get priority over older alums, because the older alums would have earned the right to sit closer. That though does not really solve the problem because the older alums that would sit there would most likely NOT stand or make much noise. For that reason I say leave the students on that whole side.

First off you shouldnt have to donate to get good seats. I hate that, schools and teams always wonder why they cant have a full house, well when it cost you your first born child and an arm and leg for good seats…uh duh!!!

WOY.

You should have went to the University of the Soviet Union…

This is ther way it works… everywhere.

Im just saying lower prices = more people. Whats better 5,000 a game or 9,000 a game?..Im a Jaguars fan and in their case whats better 47,000 ppl or 74,000 ppl? hmmm I wonder

While I agree that lower prices mean more people, your plan would remove the incentive people have to donate more.

If I could sit lower level at $49 a year, why would I ever donate more?

I just mean you shouldnt have to donate as much…didnt someone say its 10,000 a year? or something

There are only so many seats to sell tickets for.

The more you donate, the lower you’ll go, it’s that simple. It’s the best way to encourage people to give $$$, which we sorely need.

Yea I guess we dont have football so bball has to carry the athletic department

It would take you approximately $10,000 this year and a donation of about $2000 yearly thereafter to get you in the lower level, charlotteguy. FWIW, that wouldn’t get you in the building at some places.

or 22,000 in out of state tuition since im a student…but whatever lol