I really think you could blame our Athletic Department, Delonte Hill, and Huggy… how much percenatge you put on any of the three depends on what you consider “bad” or “over the line”
Everyone in the country knew that Beasley was going to go wherever Hill was… you would think we would put something in his contract as soon as they changed the NBA rule (I’ve read somewhere that Beasley really wasn’t even going to play in college but they changed the rule so he had too and he was going to follow Hill and play for a year to help him out) The AD should have known that we need to keep Hill here if we wanted to keep Beasley, put some sort of clause in his contract about going to another school or something, I think we handled that poor.
Now think about this, if you work for a company and you like where you are, but let’s say another company comes along and says, “we will double your salary if you come work for us” If you like the company you work for, wouldn’t you at least tell them that they are making you an offer to pay you a lot more… give them a chance to match? He didn’t do that, and to add insult he left a message saying he was leaving… I think that’s pretty messed up to do to a place that gave you 2 second chances. (Talking about Hill)
So now on Huggy… I’m sure he went to the KSU AD and said if we get Hill here we have a top 5 recruit next year gauranteed… all they had to do is write the check… is that messed up? I guess it depends on who you ask, I think it kind of is but I also think if the other two players (Hill and our AD) did their end it wouldn’t have come to that.[/quote]
I am SOOO sick of this revisionist history. Beasley was NOT even on the map when Lutz gave Hill a job, as he had done previously with former players (ie; Dee Tolliver). Bobby did NOT give Hill the job because of Beasley. Beasley was not well known (certainly not a to-rated player) at the time Hill was hired.
However, it is clear that Huggins DID 100% unequivocably hire Hill to get Beasley. It was the 11th hour and Beasley was a top 5 player coming out. Again, keep in mind (as someone posted above) that all this came on the heels of Lutz going out of his way to “stand up” for Huggins during his trouble. This was Huggs thank you. I actually liked Huggins during our rivalry years, but after the Beasley/Hill back-stabbing I no longer respected him as a person.
Also, they didn’t double his salary initially. It was MORE than doubled later though. Initially, he left for ~what he was making here although I’m sure they “promised him more down the road”.[/quote]
Calm down buddy. I never said Beasley was around when we hired Hill, but as soon as we got the commitement from Beasley because of Hill there should have been some contract extensions as well as additional perks, top 5 players are program changers and if the AD doesn’t know this they got what they derserved… Hell everytime a coach makes it to the sweet 16 they get 5 years extended on their contract and a raise… we couldn’t do the same for Hill to keep him here?