Ahahaha - Classic!
[font=lucida grande]goodmanonfox[/font]
Still in mix. Dooley leader right now. RT @ejschultz3: @goodmanonfox whatâs the latest on Charlotte job? Kelsey still a contender?
In all seriousness how can he make statements like that. Is someone in the Athletic Dept. calling him? Does Dooley even know he is in the lead. Does Judy say Dooley you are our leader and we just need to interview a couple of other people to make ourselves feel good and be sure to use this front runner status against us when we start negotiating salary? WTF[/quote][/quote]
Talking head getting paid to talk whether they know anything or not. All they do is throw BS around.
These guys use the âHootie-at-a-bar Theoryâ. Hit on 200 chicks, if 1% like you, youâve got a threesome.[/quote]
Or how it works out for my friend who uses this approach.
Hit on 200 chicks, when 0% like you, youâve established a reputation as a creep.
andy katz new list posted todayâŚ
[ul][li]Joe Dooley - At one point, KU asst was a hot name for ECU opening. Considered to be the leader for Charlotte.[/li]
[li]Bob Kelsey - Associate HC at Xavier says ânothing happeningâ.[/li]
[li]Dave Odom - Former Wake Forest coach has been mentioned as a candidate.[/li]
[li]Larry Shyatt - UF associate HC is interested in the opening.[/li][/ul]
The trail had briefly gone cold on the open head coaching job at Charlotte, but now some names are heating up again.
[quote=âtruninersfan, post:83, topic:22903â]andy katz new list posted todayâŚ
[ul][li]Joe Dooley - At one point, KU asst was a hot name for ECU opening. Considered to be the leader for Charlotte.[/li]
[li]Bob Kelsey - Associate HC at Xavier says ânothing happeningâ.[/li]
[li]Dave Odom - Former Wake Forest coach has been mentioned as a candidate.[/li]
[li]Larry Shyatt - UF associate HC is interested in the opening.[/li][/ul]
The trail had briefly gone cold on the open head coaching job at Charlotte, but now some names are heating up again.[/quote]
So basically people in the business use Ninernation.net as a resourceâŚ
[quote=â919R, post:75, topic:22903â]Serious questionâŚSo, getting in 1-2 times over the last 5 years is better than getting in 5-6 times a few years before? I just donât get that. I think its more important to look at what a coach has done overall, not JUST the last 2-3 years.[/quote]I was reflecting on the âlosersâ comment, which I found odd considering these so-called losers had been to the NCAA during the past 5 seasons and we havenât. Thatâs all.
Anyway, my expectation is postseason EVERY season, with that being primarily the NCAA tourney. Now, I realize that isnât always going to happen, but I do expect that it will happen with regularity. So weâre on the same page as far as that goes.
[quote=âCharlotte2002, post:84, topic:22903â][quote=âtruninersfan, post:83, topic:22903â]andy katz new list posted todayâŚ
[ul][li]Joe Dooley - At one point, KU asst was a hot name for ECU opening. Considered to be the leader for Charlotte.[/li]
[li]Bob Kelsey - Associate HC at Xavier says ânothing happeningâ.[/li]
[li]Dave Odom - Former Wake Forest coach has been mentioned as a candidate.[/li]
[li]Larry Shyatt - UF associate HC is interested in the opening.[/li][/ul]
The trail had briefly gone cold on the open head coaching job at Charlotte, but now some names are heating up again.[/quote]
So basically people in the business use Ninernation.net as a resourceâŚ[/quote]it appears that way
Bob Kelsey? Is that Patâs brother?
Goodman is at least throwing out some names, I believe he has sources, I agree it seems unlikely that he knows who the leader is, but at least he has unique info. Katz has been rehashing otherâs scoops and throwing darts the whole time, itâs obvious that he isnât following this search at all.
we should start throwing shit against the wall to see which names stick and get on these blogs.
[quote=â919R, post:75, topic:22903â][quote=ârun49er, post:72, topic:22903â][quote=â919R, post:70, topic:22903â]Brownellânot a bad choice (probably 4-5th on my personal list after Kelsey, Hopkins, Dooley and Groce) but McKillop and Young. :
You conveniently mention their appearancesin the last 5 years (2 for McKillop and I guess 1 for YoungâŚWOW! McKillop has been at Davidson for what ~20 years and has how many NCAA trips (no wins until Steph came along and Iâm willing to bet no more for a while). Not saying their âlosersâ but they arenât necessarily Hall of Famers either. Iâd put Lutzâ record well above either of them although McKillop does get a little extra credit for his one âmiracle runâ.[/quote]I mentioned the past 5 years because thatâs one of the main reasons - if not THE main reason - Lutz is no longer coach. Yes, the SoCon is what it is, but the fact remains that someone mentioned âlosersâ to describe coaches who have taken their respective teams to the Big Dance since the last time the Niners went. And Iâll say Davidson gets back to NCAAs within the next 2-3 years. Hopefully we will have been again by then.
Anyway, not lobbying for McKillop or Young to be the coach, just amused by comments that are way off base. And when speaking of âmiracle runs,â Davidsonâs a lot more recent than ours.[/quote]
Serious questionâŚSo, getting in 1-2 times over the last 5 years is better than getting in 5-6 times a few years before? I just donât get that. I think its more important to look at what a coach has done overall, not JUST the last 2-3 years.[/quote]
In a way I agree with this. But as far as what have you done lately (I believe 49erFootballNow mentioned it too) the check for making the NCAA in 2005 stopped this season. So it that sense, yes, what have you done for me lately definitely matters.
[quote=âjcl49er, post:78, topic:22903â][quote=â919R, post:75, topic:22903â][quote=ârun49er, post:72, topic:22903â][quote=â919R, post:70, topic:22903â]Brownellânot a bad choice (probably 4-5th on my personal list after Kelsey, Hopkins, Dooley and Groce) but McKillop and Young. : You conveniently mention their appearancesin the last 5 years (2 for McKillop and I guess 1 for YoungâŚWOW! McKillop has been at Davidson for what ~20 years and has how many NCAA trips (no wins until Steph came along and Iâm willing to bet no more for a while). Not saying their âlosersâ but they arenât necessarily Hall of Famers either. Iâd put Lutzâ record well above either of them although McKillop does get a little extra credit for his one âmiracle runâ.[/quote]I mentioned the past 5 years because thatâs one of the main reasons - if not THE main reason - Lutz is no longer coach. Yes, the SoCon is what it is, but the fact remains that someone mentioned âlosersâ to describe coaches who have taken their respective teams to the Big Dance since the last time the Niners went. And Iâll say Davidson gets back to NCAAs within the next 2-3 years. Hopefully we will have been again by then.
Anyway, not lobbying for McKillop or Young to be the coach, just amused by comments that are way off base. And when speaking of âmiracle runs,â Davidsonâs a lot more recent than ours.[/quote]
Serious questionâŚSo, getting in 1-2 times over the last 5 years is better than getting in 5-6 times a few years before? I just donât get that. I think its more important to look at what a coach has done overall, not JUST the last 2-3 years.[/quote]
Then Iâm glad youâre not our AD/Chancellor or Bobby would likely still be coaching. Whether you agree with it or not, itâs âwhat have you done for me latelyâ for a lot of schools.
IMO, if youâre comparing coaches in 2010:
2 NCAA appearances in last 5 years > 5 appearances prior to 2006
With that said, I would rather have Lutz back than McKillop. Like Bob a lot and think heâs a class act but heâs not big enough for our program as arrogant as that sounds.[/quote]
That WAS my point too.
if you think lutz is as good a coach as mckillop youre crazy. i dont like davidson but he has done more with that program than any coach should.
Now weâre talking. Kelsey, Hopkins, DooleyâŚ
Hopkins appears to be the new name.
âŚand I think youâre crazy for thinking otherwise. Look at their overall records. To me its not even close. Lutz is WAY better.
âŚand I think youâre crazy for thinking otherwise. Look at their overalll records.[/quote]
lutz had a better record because he had better talent.
Id be ok with Kelsey, Hopkins, Dooley, or even Gottfried.
I know this board seems to overwhelmingly favor Kelsey, and Iâll agree heâs pretty exciting, but he is VERY green (pun). I mean, heâs really had only 6 years of being a true assistant coach (1st 3 years as dir of basketball operations at wake). The other guys def have more experience. Iâll trust the interview process on this one, I suppose (as long as its not a crazy ass choice like Odom, which iâm sure it wont be).
im not worried about kelseyâs inexperience but someone like gottfried scares me since he was fired from alabama. it still worries me that the article mentions that guys like odom are still in the discussion.
âŚand I think youâre crazy for thinking otherwise. Look at their overalll records.[/quote]
lutz had a better record because he had better talent.[/quote]
And also coached against teams with much, much better talent than the teams McKillop has coached against. It all evens out, Lutz had better talent, but McKillop didnât have to coach against Pitino, Huggins and CalipariâŚ
[quote=âIron9er, post:96, topic:22903â]Id be ok with Kelsey, Hopkins, Dooley, or even Gottfried.
I know this board seems to overwhelmingly favor Kelsey, and Iâll agree heâs pretty exciting, but he is VERY green (pun). I mean, heâs really had only 6 years of being a true assistant coach (1st 3 years as dir of basketball operations at wake). The other guys def have more experience. Iâll trust the interview process on this one, I suppose (as long as its not a crazy ass choice like Odom, which iâm sure it wont be).[/quote]
Itâs natural to want to hit a homerun, with Dooley and Gottfried we have seen what they can do as head coaches, but Kelsey is more of an unknown, which means he could potentially be the greatest coach in sports history.
[quote=âCMack124, post:99, topic:22903â][quote=âIron9er, post:96, topic:22903â]Id be ok with Kelsey, Hopkins, Dooley, or even Gottfried.
I know this board seems to overwhelmingly favor Kelsey, and Iâll agree heâs pretty exciting, but he is VERY green (pun). I mean, heâs really had only 6 years of being a true assistant coach (1st 3 years as dir of basketball operations at wake). The other guys def have more experience. Iâll trust the interview process on this one, I suppose (as long as its not a crazy ass choice like Odom, which iâm sure it wont be).[/quote]
Itâs natural to want to hit a homerun, with Dooley and Gottfried we have seen what they can do as head coaches, but Kelsey is more of an unknown, which means he could potentially be the greatest coach in sports history.[/quote]
im not too worried about his coaching ability. he has worked with some great coaches and we know he can recruit.